Cases 11 - 20 of 1,698
Griffin v. Calderon et al
as 6:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Dathan A Griffin
Defendant:
Weissman Paul, PLLC, Luis F. Calderon, Zachary J Oxley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.J., et al v. Michael Blaquiere, et al
as 24-12494
Plaintiff:
BETTY JEAN MURPHY JAMES and C.J.
Defendant:
MICHAEL BLAQUIERE, DOWNY CASEY and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES
Murphy v. Gordon
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Rosie Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Dontae Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Murphy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 8:2024cv01589
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Gregory Earl Murphy, Sr. and Sh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Summergate Development, LLC v. Sandstone Site Services LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00329
Defendant:
Sandstone Site Services LLC, Andrew Hunter Murphy, Sandstone Trucking, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Summergate Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00354
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01426
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Florence Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
