Cases 11 - 20 of 2,313
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cole v. Morar Environmental Recovery LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60879
Plaintiff:
Duane Stephen Cole
Defendant:
Moran Environmental Recovery LLC, Eric Ginnis, Ross Zelnick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Stoutamire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Stoutamire, Juan Provencio, Patrick Prudish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Physician's Central Business Office & Affiliates, et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 24-10817
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIAN'S CENTRAL BUSINESS OFFICE & AFFILIATES, MARIA CRISTINA CRESPO-SMITH, NESTOR JAVECH and others
Defendant:
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
FAI rent-a-jet GmbH v. Covac Global Holdings, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80608
Plaintiff:
FAI rent-a-jet GmbH
Defendant:
Covac Global Holdings, Inc., Covac Global LLC, Ross Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lane v. Complete Maintenance Company
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Lane
Defendant:
Complete Maintenance Company
Parker v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80260
Plaintiff:
Arlecia Parker
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
