Cases 11 - 20 of 10,337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Christopher Terry
as 24-11674
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREW TERRY
Felton v. McFarlane
as 3:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Jonathan Felton
Respondent:
Warden Andrew McFarlane
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felton v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Jonathan Felton
Respondent:
Warden Andrew McFarlane
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlop et al v. Cramer et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dunlop and Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Jeffery M. Cramer, Mary Polly Frederick and Home Real Estate, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cullins et al v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02188
Defendant:
Valor Protection Security Agency LLC, City of Atlanta, Georgia, Fogo De Chao Churrascaria (Atlanta) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin Cullins and Mya Cullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Walker
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wood
as 8:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Charity Noelle Wood
Defendant:
Jonathan Robert Hawkin, The State of Florida, Paul Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jamonte Brinkley
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew Mcfarlane, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
