Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Wegrzyn v. Mascara et al
as 2:2015cv14404
Plaintiff: Michael D. Wegrzyn
Defendant: Ken J. Mascara , Tighe , Sorovec and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Elhelw v. St. Lucie County Sheriff et al
as 2:2015cv14334
Plaintiff: Ahmed Elhelw
Defendant: St. Lucie County Sheriff, Director, St. Lucie County Jail, Chaplain, St. Lucie County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wegrzyn v. Mascara et al
as 2:2015cv14299
Plaintiff: Michael D. Wegrzyn
Defendant: Ken J. Mascara, Mr. Tighe, Mr. Sorovec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. Aramark Food Services
as 6:2012cv01349
Plaintiff: Steve Allen Mattison
Defendant: Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susa Nasa v. Aramark Food Services, et al
as 12-14040
Plaintiff - Appellant: SUSA NASA
Defendant - Appellee: ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, TRINITY FOOD GROUP, INC. and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, F.C.J.
Daniels v. Kimbrough et al
as 1:2012cv00469
Plaintiff: Douglas Daniels
Defendant: Kim Kimbrough, Aramark Food Service and Clayton County Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. Clayton County Jail et al
as 1:2011cv02802
Plaintiff: Jermaine K. Clemmons
Defendant: Clayton County Jail and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasa v. Aramark Food Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02746
Plaintiff: Susa Nasa
Defendant: Aramark Food Services , Trinity Food Group, Inc. and Correctional Medical Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez, Jr. v. Age et al
as 4:2010cv10090
Plaintiff: Orlando G. Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant: T. Age, KK. Allen, T. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALMON v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv00998
Plaintiff: Howard James Salmon
Defendant: Aramark Food Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?