Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Thomas et al v. BancorpSouth Bank et al
as 1:2012cv22180
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Thomas, III and Billy D. Lawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth Bank and Bancorpsouth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BancorpSouth Bank v. Shane Swift
as 12-90024
Petitioner:
BANCORPSOUTH BANK
Respondent:
SHANE SWIFT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Shane Swift v. BancorpSouth Bank
as 12-12386
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHANE SWIFT
Defendant - Appellant:
BANCORPSOUTH BANK
CHARTERBANK v. LBK LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
CHARTERBANK
Defendant:
LBK LLC, BANCORPSOUTH BANK, PENNY TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
E.J. Saad, P.C. v. Hinkle Metals & Supply Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
E.J. Saad, P.C.
Defendant:
Hinkle Metals & Supply Co., Inc. , Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service and BancorpSouth Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Air Comfort Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Air Comfort Company, Inc. , Stanley E. Small and Helen M. Small
Intervenor:
BancorpSouth Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. Bancorpsouth Bank, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyson et al v. Bancorpsouth Bank et al
as 2:2010cv00927
Plaintiff:
Tommy Tyson and Eddie Jewel Tyson
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth Bank, Rodger L. Harris and Vernice Josey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift v. Bancorpsouth Bank
as 1:2010cv23872
Plaintiff:
Shane Swift
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWIFT v. BANCORPSOUTH BANK
as 1:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Shane Swift
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth, Inc. d/b/a Bancorpsouth Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
