Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Doe v. Bridgecrest Acceptance et al
as 1:2020cv24218
Defendant:
Bridgecrest Acceptance also known as Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation also known as Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation as Assignee doing business as Steven J Fink doing business as Steven J Fink & Associates, Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation as Assignee and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04819
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02948
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Moore v. Marshall et al
as 2:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Kim Ballard, Raymond C. Fidel, National Drivetime Used Automobile Sales and others
Plaintiff:
Edward James Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02095
Plaintiff:
Lee Cunningham
Defendant:
Twenty 4 Seven Recovery, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc., Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karolewicz v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
as 3:2018cv01496
Plaintiff:
Daniel Karolewicz
Defendant:
Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
Bryant v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
as 6:2018cv01292
Plaintiff:
Shelby Jones Bryant
Defendant:
Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
