Cases 11 - 20 of 663
Britt v. Durham et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Chandler Durham, Turbo the Great, Warner-Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
USA v. Darryl Chandler
as 24-10660
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DARRYL LEE CHANDLER
Chandler v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv05579
Plaintiff:
Shanita Chandler
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cottongim et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cottongim, Kyle Allen Cadwallader, Keith Calhoun and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nails v. St Joesph's /Chandler et al
as 2:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
St Joesph's /Chandler, Karen Turner and Dajaunia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Chandler v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv05553
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Kebo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv05529
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Kebo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Flora et al
as 1:2023mi00112
Plaintiff:
Katrina N. Sutton
Defendant:
Judge Amanda Flora, ATT. Richard Taylor, Colton Creek Chandler Residential's C.E.O. (s) and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Chandler v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv04624
Plaintiff:
Jakale Chandler
Defendant:
Kebo Taylor, Gwinnett County Jail and Gwinnett County City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
