Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Pyle v. Randle, et al
as 3:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
William D Pyle
Defendant:
Randle, State of Florida, Florida D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbia v. Mark Inch
as 2:2021cv00773
Petitioner:
John Russell Columbia
Respondent:
Florida D.O.C. and Secretary Mark S. Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COSTON v. OKALOOSA COUNTY D.O.C.
as 3:2021cv00542
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL T COSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Chief Executive Office of JPa, et al
as 21-10624
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA-D.O.C., JPAY BOARD OF DIRECTORS, JPAY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Heard v. Kemp et al
as 2:2021mi00004
Defendant:
D.O.C., Commissioner, Att. Gen. of Ga. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Cope v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
State of Alabama, D.O.C., Steven T. Marshall and Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Small v. Florida Department of Corrections (Collier County)
as 2:2021cv00006
Respondent:
Florida D.O.C. and State of Florida
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Small, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Inch et al
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Mark S Inch, Florida D.O.C. and FNU Dubrey
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Leon Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Director of JPay Corporation, et al
as 20-13852
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FOR JPAY CORPORATION, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA-D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Raghubir v. Warden Cross City CI et al
as 6:2020cv01655
Defendant:
F.D.L.E., Medical Staff D.O.C., D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
