Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
GAY v. CLERK OF COURT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv01285
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER DANIEL GAY
Defendant: Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02505
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02510
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
GAY v. CLERK OF COURT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00315
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER DANIEL GAY
Defendant: CLERK OF COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Head et al
as 1:2010cv02517
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant: Patrick H. Head and Adele P. Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Head
as 1:2010cv00689
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant: Patrick H. Head
Gay v. Holt et al
as 2:2008cv01517
Petitioner: Christopher Daniel Gay
Respondent: Kathy Holt and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. DeLoach et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00561
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant: James DeLoach and Cathy Holt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gay v. Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
as 4:2008cv00719
Petitioner: Christopher Daniel Gay
Respondent: Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gay v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00239
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant: State of Alabama, St. Clair County, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?