Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Wells v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv04847
Defendant:
Target Corporation and John Does 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
Dalton Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and John Does 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riley v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 1:2018cv05736
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and John Does 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
Alvin Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stewart et al v. Dillard's Department Stores et al
as 1:2018cv03021
Plaintiff:
Ewart Stewart and Marcia Stewart
Defendant:
Dillard's Department Stores , Terramecia Frazier , Alejandro Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fahmy Enterprises, LLC v. Baim et al
as 1:2018cv01432
Plaintiff:
Fahmy Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Mark Baim , Genesis Home Solutions , John and Jane Does 1 through 2 and others
Counter_claimant:
Mark Baim and Genesis Home Solutions
Counter_defendant:
Fahmy Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
MURRAY v. ST. VINCENT'S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al
as 0:2017cv60536
Plaintiff:
JERRY MURRAY
Defendant:
ST. VINCENT'S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and DOES 1 through 2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Daniel Cobble v. Does
as 17-10375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DOES, Janes Does 1 and 2, "Stores Ladys (sic) at Baldwin State Prison"
Zarr et al v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv20312
Plaintiff:
Laurie Zarr and Alan Zarr
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation, John Doe and Jane Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perry v. Downs
as 6:2016cv00401
Respondent:
Robert Downs
Petitioner:
Timothy Arthur Perry
Defendant:
United States Prisoner Transport and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
