Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 561
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Scott v. Walgreen Co.
as 6:2024cv00122
Plaintiff: Robin V. Scott
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Other: Donna Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner: Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent: Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Story v. Pierson
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Daisy Story
Defendant: David Pierson
Other: Donna Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones et al v. Flora et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Clyde Kennard Jones
Defendant: Amanda Flora, April Blackburn, Gregory Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEARD v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner: DOYLE L HEARD
Respondent: RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY B MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McVeigh v. Wooten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00107
Plaintiff: Lovie McVeigh
Defendant: Doyle Wooten, Jeremy Anderson, Kyle Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Account Receivable
In re: Doyle Heard
as 23-13974
Petitioner: In re: DOYLE L. HEARD
England et al v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05443
Plaintiff: Lateral England, Crysten Jackson and Niyah Thurmond
Defendant: Clayton County, Georgia, CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC, Millenia Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOLDEN v. DIXON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00493
Plaintiff: SAMUEL CHRISTOPHER GOLDEN
Defendant: RICKY D DIXON, TATIANA R SALVADOR, STEPHANIE W RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?