Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00688
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Bryan Gavins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Tyree Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudd v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Sgt. Thompkins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Ray Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00452
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Nita Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00353
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Easterling Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling, Jr. et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00303
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
Fred Easterling, Jr.
Jarrell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Marquise Jarrell
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Easterling Correctional Facility, Walter Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Octavius T. McDonald
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Ms. McClure, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prude v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Franklin Prude
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Walter Myers, Sgt. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Richie et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Draper Scott Terry
Defendant:
Warden Richie, Captain Lawson, Mr. Anglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Neil et al
as 2:2016cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Neil, Easterling, Hoover Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
