Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Direct Enterprises Inc v. Wondfo USA Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Direct Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Wondfo USA Co., Ltd., Instant Technologies, Inc., Instant Tech Subsidiary Acquisition, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Onuoha Azu v. Instant Checkmate, et al
as 21-11515
Defendant / Appellee:
INSTANT CHECKMATE, KRIS C. KIBASH and JOEY D. ROCCO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ONUOHA AZU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
S.P.S. v. INSTANT BRANDS INC, et al.
as 4:2019cv00212
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS INC, DOUBLE INSIGHT INC and DOUBLE INSIGHT INC doing business as INSTANT POT COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MINOR CHILD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dustin Matthew Smith
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc. and Double Insight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coker v. Instant Checkmate, LLC. et al
as 1:2019cv00736
Defendant:
Truthfinder, LLC., Instant Checkmate, Inc., Instant Checkmate, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dixon Coker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Youing v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04461
Defendant:
Double Insight, Inc., Instant Brands, Inc. and Double Insight, Inc. doing business as Instant Pot Company
Plaintiff:
Kevonna Michelle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Azu v. Instant Checkmate et al
as 1:2019cv04182
Defendant:
Joey D. Rocco, Instant Checkmate and Kris C. Kibash
Plaintiff:
Onuoha Azu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Instant One Media, Inc. v. Digital Consulting KC, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02906
Plaintiff:
Instant One Media, Inc.
Defendant:
Alex Mikhael and Digital Consulting KC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Instant One Media, Inc. v. EzFauxDecor, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00540
Plaintiff:
Instant One Media, Inc.
Defendant:
EzFauxDecor, LLC and Amber Shank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
