Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90352
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: JAMES DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04505
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: JAMES DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14632
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: JAMES DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COWEN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03196
Plaintiff: WILLIAM CURTIS, II, KURT EVERETT DARBY, JACK DUNCAN and others
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PITTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00255
Plaintiff: RANDALL PITTS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KENDES ARCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. James Dixon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-14354
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DIXON, a.k.a. Smoke
Dixon v. Correctional Medical Services (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00323
Plaintiff: Michael James Dixon
Defendant: Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2008cv00760
Plaintiff: James Dixon
Defendant: Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Ammons
as 5:2007cv00027
Plaintiff: James Dixon
Defendant: Thomas Ammons, Jr. and Thomas Ammons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?