Cases 11 - 20 of 23
CLARK v. TOBY et al
as 5:2018cv00339
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN IVEY, UNIT MANAGER PASCAL, CHIEF COUNSELOR FOLSOM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Warden Kilpatrick et al
as 6:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clark
Defendant:
Kilpatrick, Smith, West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. TODD et al
as 5:2016cv00350
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK
Defendant:
JACK ALLEN TODD, ZELL MILLER, ANGIE EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Clark v. Meriwether County Courts, et al
as 15-13239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MERIWETHER COUNTY COURTS, STATE OF GEORGIA, MERIWETHER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Clark v. The Corporation of Meriwether County Courts et al
as 3:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clark
Defendant:
The Corporation of Meriwether County Courts, The Corporation of the State of Georgia, The Corporation of the Meriwether County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. The Corporation of Meriwether County Superior Court et al
as 3:2015cv00006
Petitioner:
Kenneth Clark
Respondent:
The Corporation of Meriwether County Superior Court, The Corporation of the District Attorney Office for Meriwether County, The Corporation of the State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Pruitt v. Warden, et al
as 15-10092
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH CLARK PRUITT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Pruitt v. Hooks et al
as 1:2014cv00120
Petitioner:
Kenneth Clark Pruitt
Respondent:
Brad Hooks and Sam Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Kenneth Pruitt
as 14-10691
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH CLARK PRUITT
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Al-Khalifa v. Bercon et al
as 1:2012cv02282
Plaintiff:
Oluwashina Ahmed Al-Khalifa
Defendant:
John Bercon, Dominic Grieve, Nazil Afzal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
