Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 523
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff: Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant: Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Bennett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff: Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant: Lt. Bennett, Joseph H. Headley and Warden Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00209
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff: Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Demetra L. Corcino, Officer Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smithart et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: Rashad C. Lee
Defendant: Burt Smithart, Ben Reeves and Rebecca Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01623
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff: Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Karen Williams, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cullman County Jail
as 5:2023cv01566
Plaintiff: Mark Ples Jones
Defendant: Cullman County Jail, Matt Gentry, Kelly Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00736
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Burgess v. Allen
as 5:2023cv01548
Petitioner: Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Respondent: Kelly Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?