Cases 11 - 20 of 611
HEITMAN et al v. AZIYO BIOLOGICS INC et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kurt Heitman and Natalie Heitman
Defendant:
Aziyo Biologics, Inc., SpinalGraft Technologies, LLC, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Richard Yuengling, et al v. Rachel Floyd, et al
as 24-10249
Plaintiff:
RICHARD YUENGLING and REBECCA YUENGLING
Defendant:
RACHEL FLOYD, KURT S. BROWNING, RAY GADD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Willard v. Richardson et al
as 5:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WILLARD
Defendant:
KURT GERARD RICHARDSON, L.J. ROGERS, JR. TRUCKING, INC. and PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SKOVGAARD et al v. NCL CORPORATION LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv24269
Plaintiff:
HELLE SKOVGAARD and KURT JEPSEN
Defendant:
NCL CORPORATION LTD., NORWEIGAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS, LTD. and NCL (Bahamas) Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
