Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Santana-Cuesta v. Maldonado-Vargas et al
as 6:2021mc00028
Defendant:
Ernesto A. Maldonado, Tito, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando M. Santana-Cuesta
Doe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv01057
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Mary Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BEARDEN v. CLEVELAND et al
as 3:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JUSTIN BEARDEN
Defendant:
DR DOE, NURSE MARIE DOE, LIEUTENANT J J DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROZO et al v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 6:2017cv01571
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rozo and Amanda Andrade-Rozo
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. , Walmart Stores Inc , Walmart Stores East, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Andrews v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00814
Plaintiff:
Anita Andrews
Defendant:
Mike Scott, Deputy Brandon Marshall, Sergeant Robert Kizzire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
998 SW 144th Court Rd, LLC v. Lovejoy et al
as 5:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
998 SW 144th Court Rd, LLC
Defendant:
Sarah K. Lovejoy, Sheryl K. Tinoco, William C. Mawhinney and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Discrimination
Roy Day v. UPS, et al
as 15-11176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DAY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., D. SCOTT DAVIS, DAVID P. ABNEY and others
Day v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02433
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Day
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., D. Scott Davis, David P. Abney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sackman v. Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Lauren Sackman
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
White v. Southern Poverty Law Center et al
as 2:2013cv14126
Plaintiff:
Phillip White
Defendant:
Southern Poverty Law Center , Jeffrey Doe, Mary Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
