Cases 11 - 20 of 573
Edmond, Lucson v. Pena
as 1:2024cv20769
Plaintiff:
Lucson Edmond
Defendant:
Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelosi-Dahl v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant:
Scotty Rhoden, Julie C. Johnson, Brian S. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison et al v. Pena et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Allyson Jemison, Mary Jemison, Rachel Roberson and others
Defendant:
Angel Pena and City Of Foley Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pena v. Helidosa Aviation Group, S.A.
as 6:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Keila Marie Pena
Defendant:
HELIDOSA AVIATION GROUP, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Pena v. Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05549
Plaintiff:
Judith Pena
Defendant:
Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Pena v. Container King Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05204
Plaintiff:
Jamie Pena
Defendant:
Container King Transport, LLC, Barry Tollison and Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Pena v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02475
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Pena and Carlos Pena
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Pena v. Raich
as 1:2023cv24001
Plaintiff:
Hugo Pena
Defendant:
Jamie A. Raich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Victor Pena-Abreu
as 23-13428
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL PENA-ABREU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
