Cases 11 - 20 of 138
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16435
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TODD SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12178
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07558
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Smith
as 1:2022cv02217
Petitioner:
Robert L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Dooly State Prison and Amie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04467
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SMITH v. MILLER et al
as 5:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W SMITH
Defendant:
CO II MILLER, LT HUDSON, OFFICER LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64777
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv01026
Plaintiff:
JATOON MOSS
Defendant:
MARK INCH, WILLIAM JEFFREY JERRELS, JOHN NETTLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
