Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Earley et al
as 1:2016cv01180
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bryant Earley, Earley Construction Co., Inc., City of Roswell, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. IN RE: SEIZURE OF: $101,380.00 FROM SAM JONES SEWELL
as 0:2015mc60162
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
IN RE: SEIZURE OF: $101,380.00 FROM SAM JONES SEWELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983
Marvin Goodman v. Bill Reed, et al
as 14-15472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEE GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL REED and SAM JONES
Marvin Goodman v. Sam Jones, et al
as 14-14979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEE GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDELL BEAM, Sheriff of Spalding County, SAM JONES, Special Agent for Spalding County, JOHN CORLEY, Special Agent for Spalding County and others
Goodman v. Reed et al
as 3:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dee Goodman
Defendant:
Bill Reed and Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Utica National Assurance Company v. Sam Jones Memorial United Methodist Church, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Utica National Assurance Company
Defendant:
Sam Jones Memorial United Methodist Church, Inc., Terry Howren and Patty Howren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Goodman v. Beam et al
as 3:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dee Goodman
Defendant:
Wendell Beam, Sam Jones, John Corley and others
Gordon Vaughn v. State of Alabama, et al
as 13-11255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GORDON VAUGHN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, SAM COCHRAN, NOAH OLIVER and others
Vaughn v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vaughn
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Sam Cochran, Noah Price Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vaughn
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, Sam Cochran, Noah Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
