Cases 11 - 20 of 3,647
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Ramaraju Erramraju
as 24-11471
Petitioner:
In re: RAMARAJU ROM ERRAMRAJU
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linker v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Linker Christopher Ryan and Christopher Ryan Linker
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 2:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
