Cases 11 - 20 of 1,145
Admiral Insurance Company v. Vitus Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Vitus Group LLC, Riverwood Townhouses Inc., Riverwood Housing Partners LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
USA v. Ernell Shaw
as 24-10266
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERNELL SHAW
Shaw v. Liggett Group et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robert Shaw
Defendant:
Liggett Group, Vector Tobacco, Philip Morris USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McNealey v. Shaw et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Elias Daniel McNealey
Defendant:
Calvin Shaw, Lt. Zigler and G Rooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01720
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Charlemagne v. The State of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv24533
Plaintiff:
Jean-Elie Uriel Charlemagne
Defendant:
The State of Florida, Attorney General Ashley Moody, Commisioner Nicole Fried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kyle Shaw v. Elon Musk, et al
as 23-13901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE JAMES SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
ELON MUSK and ANN WOGCICKI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
