Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Cobble v. All U.S. District Court Magistrate Judges Serving, et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00031
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant:
U. S. Government Nationally and all U.S. District Court Magistrate Judges Serving with the Court of Montgomery Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. All 11th Circuit U. S. Appeals Court Clerks in Atlanta et al
as 1:2019cv00223
Defendant:
All 11th Circuit U. S. Appeals Court Clerks in Atlanta, All U.S. District Court Clerks, Macon Georgia, Brian Jarrered and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. Abrams et al
as 1:2018cv05355
Defendant:
U. S. Government and Leslie Abrams
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. U. S. Government et al
as 1:2018cv05354
Defendant:
U. S. Government and State of Georgia gov.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castleberry v. Baverman et al
as 1:2018cv04912
Plaintiff:
Daniel Castleberry
Defendant:
U. S. Government and Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00145
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
U S GOVERNMENT and STATE OF GEORGIA GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT
as 1:2018cv00102
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
U S GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
U S GOVERNMENT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
U S GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. U. S. Government Accountability Office et al
as 1:2017cv02476
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gaines
Defendant:
U. S. Government Accountability Office and Office of Inspector General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
