Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maya Fruit Corporation Inc. v. Mid West Agri Sales, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv25054
Defendant:
Mid West Agri Sales, LLC and William Foster
Plaintiff:
Maya Fruit Corporation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
K. et al v. Mobile County Board of Education et al
as 1:2018cv00343
Defendant:
Reginald Crenshaw, Superintendent Martha L. Peek, Coach Fred Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Kennesha Q., Mary K., Colby Q. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry et al v. Mobile County Board of Education et al
as 1:2018cv00343
Plaintiff:
Stacy Terry , Kennesha Quinnie and Colby Quinnie
Defendant:
Mobile County Board of Education, Douglas Harwell, Jr., Don Stringfellow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank National Association v. Foster
as 0:2015cv60169
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
William Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christine Lacy v. City of St. Petersburg, Florid, et al
as 14-14986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINE LACY, an Individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, WILLIAM FOSTER, a Former Mayor and CHUCK HARMON, Chief of Police
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
