Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,857
Walker, Jesse A. v. Weisberg et al
as 2:2024cv14161
Plaintiff: Jesse Alan Walker
Defendant: Steven Weisberg, Marry-Alice Kym Surowlec, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. USA
as 7:2024cv00051
Petitioner: FERRELL WALKER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 6:2024cv00955
Petitioner: Richard Barrett Dale Walker
Respondent: Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Peters
as 6:2024cv00943
Petitioner: Richard Barrett Dale Walker
Respondent: Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RASHADA v. HATHCOCK et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff: JADEN RASHADA
Defendant: HUGH HATHCOCK, WILLIAM NAPIER, MARCUS CASTRO-WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: AMOS WALKER
Defendant: PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant: RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Walker v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00258
Petitioner: Andrew Walker
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant: AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?