Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Athos Overseas Limited Corp. v. YouTube, Inc., et al
as 23-13156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ATHOS OVERSEAS LIMITED CORP.
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bar-Levy v. Google, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00527
Defendant:
Nelson Gomez, Google, LLC doing business as Youtube, Youtubechannel@pawastanews and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Bar-Levy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WORLD MEDIA ALLIANCE LABEL INC. v. ELLO ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv22933
Plaintiff:
WORLD MEDIA ALLIANCE LABEL INC.
Defendant:
ELLO ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, VAL SEGAL, YouTube LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
World Media Alliance Label, Inc. v. Believe SAS et al
as 1:2023cv21894
Defendant:
BELIEVE SAS, BELIEVE Co., BELIEVE and others
Plaintiff:
WORLD MEDIA ALLIANCE LABEL INC. and World Media Alliance Label, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Viral DRM LLC v. Unknown YouTube Uploaders
as 1:2023mi00012
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM LLC
Defendant:
Unknown YouTube Uploaders
Alonso v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Regina Alonso
Defendant:
Google LLC, Youtube LLC, James Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodina Foodstore Inc. v. Elatnikov et al
as 0:2022cv61591
Plaintiff:
RODINA FOODSTORE INC. and Rodina Foodstore, Inc.
Defendant:
ANDREI ELATNIKOV, NADEJDA ELATNIKOVA, YouTube LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Kifle v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04508
Plaintiff:
Elias Kifle
Defendant:
Youtube, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
