Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Washburn et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03451
Plaintiff:
John Washburn , Avery Ash , Cassandra Powers and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell et al v. Snook et al
as 1:2017cv03412
Plaintiff:
Sharon Powell
Defendant:
Patrick Snook, Annie Davis, Andrew Talbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHE v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
BILLY JOE ASHE
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. BIG LOTS STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
ALICE TAYLOR , DEXTER ASH , DONICE CHAPPELL, II and others
Defendant:
BIG LOTS STORES, INC. and GARY BOATWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GRAY v. BEN HILL COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Defendant:
BEN HILL COUNTY, JOHN DOE, BOBBY MCLEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Macrina et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill , Tallion Griggs , Jarms Biggs and others
Defendant:
Jo Ann Macrina, Yafet Bekele and City of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cathleen R. Gary
Defendant:
United States Government, Barack Obama, National Security Agency/Central Security Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ashe et al
as 1:2015cv04061
Plaintiff:
Cara Williams
Defendant:
J. R. Ashe and Gwinnett County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe v. Clayton County Sheriff Dep. et al
as 1:2015cv02759
Plaintiff:
Corey Ashe
Defendant:
Clayton County Sheriff Dep., Correct Care Medical Practice Sims and A'viands Food Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe v. Clayton County District Attorney Office et al
as 1:2015cv02502
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Ashe
Defendant:
Clayton County District Attorney Office, Tracy Graham Lawson, Jane LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
