Cases 21 - 30 of 112
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Ford
as 1:2021cv03054
Petitioner:
William Brooks, IV
Respondent:
Warden Benjamin Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv02585
Defendant:
Shallumar Smith, Gerald Walker, Timothy Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Shonnica Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MARTIN v. FORD et al
as 5:2021cv00155
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, DORM OFFICER SMITH, DORM OFFICER MANN and others
Plaintiff:
EDGAR J MARTIN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MORALES et al
as 5:2021cv00138
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSE MORALES, DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, LT CLUBPER and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Zavala v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 21-10989
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY MYRICK, TIMOTHY C. WARD, In his individual and official capacity, ROBERT TOOLE, Director of Field Operations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ZAVALA
SIMPSON v. WICKER et al
as 5:2021cv00006
Plaintiff:
JOHN LAMAR SIMPSON
Defendant:
Robert Toole, Dep Warden Security Josh Wicker and OFFICER BENJAMIN FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAMBERS v. FORD et al
as 5:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
ROY CHAMBERS, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN COFFEE, UNIT MANAGER JOHN DOE, DEPUTY WARDEN THORNTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00479
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAMOND v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00453
Defendant:
JACK SAULS, ARETHA SMITH, RODNEY JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
