Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Leone et al
as 6:2010cv01150
Plaintiff:
James R. Leone and Similarly Defrauded Social Security Retiree Beneficiaries
Defendant:
United States, Michael J. Astrue, Quittie C. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Jose Ramirez
as 10-10691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE SIXTO RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Conspirator "Aa"
Steinberg et al v. Wings Communications, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv02090
Plaintiff:
Murray L. Steinberg, Barbara F. Steinberg, George R. Colby and others
Defendant:
Wings Communications, Inc., F. Douglas Wilhite, Sherry L. Wilhite and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wood et al v. Archbold Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00109
Plaintiff:
Mark G. Wood
Defendant:
Archbold Medical Center Inc , John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. , Ken B. Beverly and others
Movant:
William A Thompson , TPA Captive Insurance Company Inc , Quincy Dialysis, Tallahassee Dialysis, West Tallahassee Dialysis, Tallahassee South, Madison Four-Freedom and others
Objector:
Quincy Dialysis, Draffin & Tucker, C.P.A. and Sewell, Morgan & Hilliard, P.C.
Counter_claimant:
Mel Hartsfield , Archbold Medical Center Inc , John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Mark G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Ricketts v. Arch et al
as 2:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ricketts
Defendant:
Denise Arch, Ronald Arch, Deneige Arch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1456 U.S. Housing Authority action re slums/urban renewal
Ricketts v. Arch et al
as 2:2007mi00007
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ricketts
Defendant:
Denise Arch, Ronald Arch, Deneige Arch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1456 U.S. Housing Authority action re slums/urban renewal
James v. Nahmias et al
as 3:2007cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tony James, Jr.
Defendant:
David E. Nahmias, James W. Kesler, Jack T. Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
