Cases 21 - 30 of 81
PIERRELOUIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94572
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GUNTHER PIERRELOUIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gunther v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03776
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A. Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robbins v. Booth et al
as 3:2020cv01115
Defendant:
Emmondo Reeder, Josh Smith, Michael Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Matt Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ OSORIO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64346
Plaintiff:
GUNTHER RODRIGUEZ OSORIO
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUNTHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56505
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL GUNTHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLFRAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08799
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GUNTHER WOLFRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv24790
Plaintiff:
Brinda Bradley, Kevin D. White, Deatirce Digman and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Pierson, III v. Bruce Rogow, et al
as 19-13722
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES 1 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE, BRUCE S. ROGOW and CYNTHIA GUNTHER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND H. PIERSON, III
Lancaster v. Hill et al
as 5:2019cv00238
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
FNU Allen, FNU Tipton, FNU Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Gunther, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.
as 19-11790
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAYNE C. GUNTHER and ROBERT C. GUNTHER
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
