Cases 21 - 30 of 182
HOLLOWAY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID HOLLOWAY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and WARDEN TAMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Harrison v. USA
as 22-13697
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael David Carruth v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-13548
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID CARRUTH
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
ALFRED v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20957
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D ALFRED and MICHAEL DAVID ALFRED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv61894
Plaintiff:
Michael David Martinez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch et al v. Bailey-Roka et al
as 2:2022cv14338
Plaintiff:
Peter Lynch, Alisa Lynch, Alisa Marie Lynch and others
Defendant:
Tanisha Bailey-Roka, Michael David Holzknecht, Lee Jeannette Rohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TORREGROSSA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13382
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID TORREGROSSA and MICHAEL DAVID TORREGROSSA, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOLDING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID GOLDING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrison v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01406
Petitioner:
Michael David Harrison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVID v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10819
Plaintiff:
JAN-MICHAEL DAVID
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
