Cases 21 - 30 of 135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Vinings Cove HOA, Inc. v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv05159
Plaintiff:
Vinings Cove HOA, Inc.
Defendant:
Batrena J. Davis, Michael Davis and All Occupants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Michael Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-14329
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-14026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Top to Bottom Cleaning LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Top to Bottom Cleaning LLC and Johnny Walker, Jr.
Heath et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams, Joseph Barnes, Quan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Davis v. Mother's Love Hospice LLC
as 1:2022cv03078
Plaintiff:
John Michael Davis
Defendant:
Mother's Love Hospice LLC doing business as Trinity Hospice Care of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
DAVIES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06809
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
