Cases 21 - 30 of 31
In re: Joe Williams
as 14-11582
Petitioner:
In re: JOE N. WILLIAMS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00307
Petitioner:
Joe N. Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Colvin et al
as 1:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Teresa N. Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
WILLIAMS v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
RUBY N WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Jones et al
as 8:2011cv02865
Plaintiff:
Cliffany N. Williams and Joyce A. Williams
Defendant:
Arthur T. Jones , Arthur T. Jones, II , Ruth Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv00898
Plaintiff:
Ras Ronald Williams and Debra N Williams
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerome Williams vs. John E. Potter, et al.
as 1:2009cv00647
Defendant:
John E. Potter, John E. Potter, Bobby L. Mays and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome N. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. McNally et al
as 2:2008cv14049
Plaintiff:
Phillip N. Williams
Defendant:
Nancy McNally, Steve Stoll, Joe Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. APALACHEE CENTER INC
as 4:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
FELTON N WILLIAMS
Defendant:
APALACHEE CENTER INC and APALACHEE CENTER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
