Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Rutledge v. McDowell et al
as 3:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Markeith Anton Rutledge
Defendant:
Cody McDowell, William C. Price, Marla Chambliss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUTLEDGE v. SMITH et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, STATE OF GEORGIA, MACON STATE PRISON and others
Petitioner:
BOBBY RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. KEMP et al
as 4:2020cv00302
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MYRON TAYLOR, II and ABDULLAH MUMIM CALIPH HAMID TAYLOR
Defendant:
RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON, Warden REAGAN BLACK, Governor BRIAN P KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eady v. Barnard et al
as 4:2020cv00261
Defendant:
Rutledge State Prison, Gregory Dozier, Terry E. Barnard and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Eady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUEST v. RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
as 4:2020cv00273
Defendant:
RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Plaintiff:
JASON RANDALL GUEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guest v. Rutledge State Prison
as 3:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Rutledge State Prison
Plaintiff:
Jason Randall Guest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. Morgan Truck Body, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03583
Defendant:
Penske Vehicle Services, Inc., David Daws, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rutledge v. Reeves et al
as 3:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Marty Reeves, Troup County Sheriff Dept., LaGrange Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Markeith Anton Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Dorsey et al
as 2:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Police Officer Donna Sims, Police Officer R. Rutledge, Probation Officer Richard Herrera and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Scott Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2020cv00022
Defendant:
WITAKER, COLLINS, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
