Cases 21 - 30 of 3,650
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 2:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
State Of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angela Nails v. State of Alabama, et al
as 24-11331
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CARRIER, ANDREW HAMLIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
