Cases 21 - 30 of 438
EZELL v. BROWN et al
as 3:2023cv16487
Plaintiff:
ROB ERIC EZELL
Defendant:
BROWN, THE GEO GROUP, TWO UNKNOWN GEO PRISON GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00458
Defendant:
Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, Rayvon L. Boatman, Donald Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Glen Spivey v. Leonard Schiofman, et al
as 23-12091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LEONARD SCHIOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE, C. E. RICHARDSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Usoh v. Geo Groups et al
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sunday Quincy Usoh
Defendant:
Geo Groups, Warden Michael Breckon, Lt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venneau v. Behesti et al
as 9:2023cv80666
Plaintiff:
Ernest Joseph Venneau
Defendant:
Behesti, Munning and GEO Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman v. Porter et al
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman and Lavon Lee Boatman
Defendant:
Elizabeth Porter, Jon P. Carner, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04897
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Merrick Garland and US Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berger v. Baptiest et al
as 3:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Jackie Berger
Defendant:
John Baptiest, R. Bassa, Centurion Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 4:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
JUAN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRUION LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
