Cases 21 - 30 of 47
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 5:2018cv00101
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders v. Lopez et al
as 3:2017cv00690
Plaintiff:
James Earl Saunders, III
Defendant:
Jo Ann Lopez, Kire Khadair Jabril Twiggs, Frank Brookings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office et al
as 8:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Lloyd
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office and B. Twiggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Twiggs et al
as 3:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee West
Defendant:
Kiree Twiggs and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Sgt. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones, T. Twiggs, Lt. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. COII Arkinson et al
as 3:2015cv01076
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee West
Defendant:
COII Arkinson, COI K. Twiggs, COI C. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. JONES et al
as 1:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J BROWN
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, REID, H GARTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENNINGTON v. TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00244
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALLEN PENNINGTON
Defendant:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA and TWIGGS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. Twiggs Learning Tree Child Care Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv80697
Plaintiff:
Keisha Smith and Sade Byrd
Defendant:
Twiggs Learning Tree Child Care Inc., Edward W. Twiggs and Eunice P. Twiggs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
PENNINGTON v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN PENNINGTON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, SCOTT RADBAUGH, LASHONDA HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
