Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Walker County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey & Company Inc et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Walker County, Alabama and City of Jasper, Alabama, The
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc United States, McKinsey & Company Inc and McKinsey & Company Inc Washington DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Owens v. Mary Windom, et al
as 21-10139
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN ODOM, Walker County Circuit Court Clerk, TOM PARKER, Alabama Supreme Court, CHRIS SHERER, Walker County Circuit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND PAUL OWENS
Woods v. Walker County, Alabama et al
as 6:2020cv01549
Defendant:
Amber Kilgore, James Underwood, Walker County, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Walker County
as 6:2020cv00753
Plaintiff:
Justin Kyle Murray
Defendant:
Walker County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Walker County Jail
as 6:2020cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Walker County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Little v. Walker County Jail et al
as 6:2020cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clayton Little
Defendant:
James Tucker, Nicholas Smith and Walker County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Walker County et al
as 7:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Larry Underwood, Walker County Commission, Walker County and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. District Court of Walker County Alabama et al
as 6:2020cv00015
Defendant:
District Court of Walker County Alabama and Circuit Court of Walker County Alabama
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neil Guthrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowser v. Walker County Jail
as 6:2019cv02128
Respondent:
Walker County Jail and Nick Smith
Petitioner:
Michael Rowser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
