Cases 21 - 30 of 363
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martin v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01998
Petitioner:
Marvin Martin
Respondent:
Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Shavers et al
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Tommie Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Shavers, Sicera Wilkes, Summer Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08412
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leonard v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01233
Petitioner:
Sentavious Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Scottwilkes
as 1:2023cv01199
Petitioner:
Sentavious Leonard
Respondent:
Warden Scottwilkes and Warden Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilk et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11524
Plaintiff:
Lawrene Wilk and Craig Wilk
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
Commissioner TYRONE OLIVER, Warden SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
