Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 8,573
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80660
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21977
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derylak et al v. White River Marine Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00947
Plaintiff: Noah Derylak, Frank Derylak and Craig Maxwell
Defendant: White River Marine Group, LLC, Dometic Marine Canada Inc., T-H Marine Supplies LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01236
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
American Resources Ins. Co., Inc. v. Ogle et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.
Defendant: Lawrence Michael Ogle, Shanil Corporation and Gulbanu H, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
Matz v. Vanleigh RV Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff: Leonard H Matz, Jr.
Defendant: Vanleigh RV Inc, Lippert Components, Inc. and Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff: Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant: A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
KHAYRALLAH v. RUTHERFORD
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: KOVO KHAYRALLAH
Defendant: JOHN H RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KHAYRALLAH v MAHON
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff: KOJO KHAYRALLAH
Defendant: MARK H MAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hesser v. Becraft Jr.
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff: Peter Hesser
Defendant: Lowel H. Becraft Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?