Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Bryan Watters v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2015cv22543
Plaintiff:
Modesto Alberto Bryan Watters
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Horne v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mickey Horne
Defendant:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Diane Andrews, Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. PALMER et al
as 4:2014cv00497
Plaintiff:
ALVIN C THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOE PALMER and R WATTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
Mickey Horne
Defendant:
John M. Palmer, Ronald Watters, G.A. Gullic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company v. Lumber One Wood Preserving LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lumber One Wood Preserving LLC , Robert C Lisk , Capitol Wholesale Fence Co and others
Counter_claimant:
Lumber One Wood Preserving LLC
Counter_defendant:
Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv01281
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ward
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, Asst. Warden Brad White Head, Sgt. Kyle Grandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Lowery et al
as 3:2012cv01102
Plaintiff:
Demetrius L. Allen
Defendant:
Brandon S. Lowery, Officer Shaw and Sgt. Watters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATTERS v. TERRY
as 5:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL WATTERS
Defendant:
WILLIAM TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
