Cases 31 - 40 of 482
Polo v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2023cv21684
Plaintiff:
Frank Polo, SR and Frank Polo, Sr.
Defendant:
Scott Marcus Bernstein, Marcia Del Rey, Spencer Multack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morancy et al v. Saloman et al
as 6:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Jean Domonique Morancy, L.M. and Jean Dominique Morancy
Defendant:
Sabrina Alex Saloman, Gerald Francis Znosko, Angela Lynn Lambiase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nadya Diaz v. Adam Hames, et al
as 23-11209
Petitioner / Appellant:
NADYA IVETTE DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM MARSHALL HAMES, MATTHEW KYLE WINCHESTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA and others
Morancy et al v. Saloman et al
as 0:2023cv60679
Plaintiff:
Jean Domonique Morancy and L.M.
Defendant:
Sabrina Alex Saloman, Gerald Francis Znosko, Angela Lynn Lambiase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Bar, Texas Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
EMRIT v. PRATT et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Defendant:
CHIEF DISIPLINARY COUNSEL, ATTORNEY KARA PRATT, TEXAS SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 1:2023cv21315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Bar, Texas Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
