Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Simmons v. Hall et al
as 2:2013cv01464
Plaintiff:
Stanley Demar Simmons
Defendant:
Noel Hall, K McKinny, Birmingham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haka v. Jefferson County Public Library et al
as 2:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Haka
Defendant:
Jefferson County Public Library, Birmingham Police Department and Jefferson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Honeycutt v. Birmingham Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv02938
Plaintiff:
Bobby Arron Honeycutt
Defendant:
Birmingham Police Department and Lampley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv02219
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Houston
Defendant:
State of Alabama, City of Birmingham Police Department, Vonetta Nunn and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-10271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02630
Plaintiff:
Theresa F Johnson
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Birmingham Police Department, A C Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Anderson et al
as 2:2010cv02107
Plaintiff:
Archie Darrin Miller
Defendant:
Rob Anderson, Rhonda Anderson, Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. City of Birmingham Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv00583
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham Police Department, A C Roper and Amir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
