Cases 31 - 40 of 370
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clay v. Britt et al
as 1:2022cv03207
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clay
Defendant:
Eddie Britt and Keane Thummel Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Conklin v. Leonard et al
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Michael Conklin
Defendant:
Jerry Leonard, Cody Rose, Adrian Fredericks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Elegant Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02708
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Defendant:
Elegant Service, Inc. and Sayeed Imran
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REID v. EVANS et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
TYNASHA EVANS, SHARON STEMBRIDGE, TAMEKA CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Clay v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01664
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clay
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
CLERVRAIN v. KEMP et al
as 5:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant:
BRIAN P KEMP, CAMERON C STAPLES, CLAY J PETRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAY v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
ALFARUS JAMES CLAY
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, MAJOR BROCK, WEAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
