Cases 31 - 40 of 45
DAVIS et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 3:2019cv04621
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS and YURIKO DAVIS
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03082
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HAHN, AMORRIS CONLEY, JONATHAN STARK and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Effingham County, Georgia et al
as 4:2019cv00028
Defendant:
Daniel Handshumaker, Matthew Logan, Effingham County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Holtz
as 2:2019cv14002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
John Holtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Holtz
as 9:2019cv80012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
John Holtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Recruitingitservices.com, LLC v. Gravitybox, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04555
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Gravitybox, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Recruitingitservices.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Milie et al v. City of Savannah
as 4:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert Milie , Terry Alberts, Jr. , Matthew Caples and others
Defendant:
City of Savannah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Christopher Davis, v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv20994
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Lyft, Inc. and Miami-Dade County, Florida
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Davis v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. et al
as 1:2014cv03847
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. and Rubin Lublin, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Lovelady et al v. City of LaFayette, Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lovelady , Mars Theater District, Inc. and Club 111, Inc.
Defendant:
City of LaFayette, Georgia , Benji Clift , Stacey Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
