Cases 31 - 40 of 389
CONRAD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18472
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS GENE CONRAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Jr. v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2023cv03097
Plaintiff:
Conrad Joseph James Jr.
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bailey v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
Conrad Bailey
Defendant:
Duprell Williams, Mayhew Trucking, LLC, Canal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
MONTOYA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13962
Plaintiff:
CONRAD MONTOYA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Proffitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
William Conrad Proffitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MARCELLI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10870
Plaintiff:
DAVID CONRAD MARCELLI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STROBEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10563
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CONRAD STROBEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TRIPP et al v. FORD
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA TRIPP, THOMAS MCFATTER, MICHAEL MURRERO-DELGADO and others
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dexter Jackson v. Lavar Ham, et al
as 23-11440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEXTER CONRAD JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAVAR HAM, CHARLES GREEN, LARHONDA HOLIDAY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
