Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Brown et al v. blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Anderson Brown and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
antony john blinken doing business as ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN secretary of state, et al. United States, janet louise yellen doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States, merrick garland doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Emory v. Thomas
as 3:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Darius Emory and Darious Emory
Defendant:
Karen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. TOBY
as 1:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
Annette Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNN v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
ANNETTE TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Espinoza et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Darius Tucker
Defendant:
Dr. Espinoza and Dr. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kade v. Pattillo
as 1:2021cv04063
Plaintiff:
William Edward Kade, Jr.
Defendant:
Darius Pattillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
