Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
ANDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00102
Plaintiff: LUCY ANDERSON , JOHN ALONGIS , JAMES BAILEY and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Enfinger v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00114
Plaintiff: Deena Enfinger
Defendant: Edward Ellington , Alabama Department of Corrections and Nurse Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golston v. Enfinger, et al. (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00946
Plaintiff: Anthony Golston
Defendant: Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tannehill v. King et al
as 5:2008cv01142
Plaintiff: James Tannehill, II
Defendant: Troy King, Tommy Ragland, Tommy Ragland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Parker v. Truett et al
as 4:2008cv00765
Plaintiff: Ashley Doral Parker
Defendant: R Truett, Blake L Dorning, Chris Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CASEY et al v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY et al
as 3:2007cv00421
Plaintiff: JOHN CASEY, JOHN CASEY, JOHN CASEY and others
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY and MIKE S STELTENKAMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
HARRIS et al v. RICHE et al
as 3:2007cv00393
Plaintiff: EDNA HARRIS and LORI ENFINGER
Defendant: RANDALL P RICHE and RANDALL P RICHE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Glading et al v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 1:2007cv21843
Plaintiff: John Glading, Jr., John Glading, Jr., Ronald Hammons and others
Defendant: RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?