Cases 31 - 40 of 3,704
Julia Robinson, et al v. USA, et al
as 24-12513
Defendant:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CIA, DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
KENDALL J. HALL and JULIA MAE ROBINSON
TLUSTY v. ALEXANDER et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Defendant:
J ELLENBURG, JOHN AND JANE DOE, ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JEFFREY TLUSTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C.J., et al v. Michael Blaquiere, et al
as 24-12494
Plaintiff:
BETTY JEAN MURPHY JAMES and C.J.
Defendant:
MICHAEL BLAQUIERE, DOWNY CASEY and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES
BERGER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2024cv00350
Defendant:
D SMITH, JANE DOE #1, JOHN WILTZ and others
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BERGER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Justin Tolston
as 24-12363
Petitioner:
In re: JUSTIN T. TOLSTON
Respondent:
GARTRELL WALTON, JOHN DOE 1-5, WADSWORTH and others
Justin TolstonIn re: Justin Tolston
as 24-12351
Respondent:
RODNEY BRYANT, GARTRELL WALTON, KEITH WADSWORTH and others
Petitioner:
In re: JUSTIN T. TOLSTON
New Residential Borrower 2022-SFR2, LLC v. Bateman et al
as 1:2024cv03170
Defendant:
Jane Doe, All Other Occupants, Adrian Bateman and others
Plaintiff:
New Residential Borrower 2022-SFR2, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DOE (A.C.) v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv22749
Defendant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE (A.C.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Tapley v. Food Lion, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03139
Defendant:
Food Lion, LLC, Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John H. Tapley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jane Doe, I.H. v. Salesforce et al
as 8:2024cv01678
Defendant:
Lachman Kaladeen, Shawn C. Henson, Choice Hotels International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, I.H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
